Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Swarnavalli and others, filed an application for a final decree regarding the partition of property as per earlier orders. The court decided on the allotment of shares among the parties based on a commission report and survey plan.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allotment of 7/11 share in the property to the petitioners.
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree allotting shares in the property as per the commission report and survey plan. The petitioners were allotted a significant share of the property based on equitable distribution.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners did not raise any objections to the commission report and survey plan.
The petitioners did not raise any objections to the commission report and survey plan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners did not raise any objections to the commission report and survey plan.
The petitioners did not raise any objections to the commission report and survey plan.
Supporting Evidence
The same is marked as Ext. C1 and Ext. C1(a). The petitioners and the fifth respondent have not raised any objection to the commission report and survey plan allotting the shares.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, final decree is passed as follows:- 1.The plot shown as 'AHJDEFGA' in Ext.C1(a) plan is allotted as the share of the petitioners.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Swarnavalli
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishnammal
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ratnakumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V. Chitraguptan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anitha V.L.
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishwaguptan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Anilguptan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Rajasekharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subhas
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Visakhaguptan
- Relation
- Died
Plaintiffs Documents
Commission Report and Survey Plan (Ext.C1, Ext.C1(a))
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Jain
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree passed allotting shares on the properties to the petitioners.
Evidence:
In the result, final decree is passed as follows:- 1.The plot shown as 'AHJDEFGA' in Ext.C1(a) plan is allotted as the share of the petitioners.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
No order regarding costs.
Evidence:
No order as to costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court used this document to make decisions regarding the allotment of shares among the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Survey Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court utilized this document to evaluate the property dimensions and possessory rights for the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2015