Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 160/2013

Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-7 years 7 months 28 days
Case Code No.
160
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lissy, the plaintiff, filed a final decree application in an earlier civil suit for partition of property. The court has heard the petition and is finalizing the partition based on a commission report.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has passed a final decree for the allotment of shares in the property among the parties. Lissy has been allotted a specific share as per the survey plan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allotment of shares in the property as per Ext.C1 and Ext.C1(a).
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court has passed a final decree for the allotment of shares in the property among the parties. Lissy has been allotted a specific share as per the survey plan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's claim for 1/3 share in the property was substantiated by the commission report and was uncontested by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner's claim for 1/3 share in the property was substantiated by the commission report and was uncontested by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, final decree is passed as follows: 1. The plot shown as 'plot GHORG’ in Ext.C1(a)-plan is allotted as the share of the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lissy
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lilly
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Liju
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Raju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Ramees Beevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree passed allotting the share of the petitioner.
Evidence:
In the result, final decree is passed as follows: The plot shown as 'plot GHORG’ in Ext.C1(a)­plan is allotted as the share of the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission report and Survey plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court used the commission report and survey plan to determine the allotment of property shares.
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Tue, 07/30/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Mini et al vs Robin regarding dismissal of petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won