OS.No.1085/2010

Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.

Court

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Judge

Smt.Sreelakshmi. C

Order Date

2025-01-27

Duration

Case Code No.

1085

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mini is the petitioner seeking relief through a Final Decree Application, while Jalaja kumari and others are the defendants. The case was heard but the petitioner failed to appear, leading to the dismissal of the application.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The Final Decree Application was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner who failed to represent their case despite due notice.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Final Decree Application

Final Judgment

The Final Decree Application was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner who failed to represent their case despite due notice.

Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the application due to the petitioner's absence.

Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the application due to the petitioner's absence.

Supporting Evidence

As no representation was made from the side of petitioner, department notice was issued. Even in spite of due service, petitioner not turned up.

Judgment Evidence:

Final Decree Application stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mini
Party Age: 48
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jalaja kumari
Party Age: 55
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sunil kumar
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sanal kumar
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.C.S.Vijayachandran Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Final Decree Application stands dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.

Evidence:

As no representation was made from the side of petitioner, department notice was issued. Even in spite of due service, petitioner not turned up. Hence Final Decree Application stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification