Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDA.No. 1711/2022

Case between Xavier @ Suresh vs Valsan @ Banedict regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months
Case Code No.
1711
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Xavier @ Suresh and Valsan @ Banedict are brothers involved in a legal dispute regarding the partition of their shared property. The court has passed a final decree regarding the division of the property into two equal shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a final decree for partitioning the property into two equal shares allotted to both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of the property into two equal shares.
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a final decree for partitioning the property into two equal shares allotted to both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found in favor of the applicant due to the absence of objections from the respondent and reliance on accepted evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The respondent was neither present nor represented before the Court on the day of final hearing or the last eight posting dates.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of finding of point No.(i) a final decree is passed in accordance with Ext.C1 series and Ext.C2 series as follows:... parties are directed to remit requisite amount for purchasing stamp paper for engrossing the final decree within 3 months from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Xavier @ Suresh
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsan @ Banedict
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Preliminary decree passed on 11/03/2022, Ext.C1 series, Ext.C2 series.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Jayachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Francis Gomez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A final decree is passed in accordance with Ext.C1 series and Ext.C2 series.
Evidence:
In the light of finding of point No.(i) a final decree is passed in accordance with Ext.C1 series and Ext.C2 series.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was accepted and relied upon for passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was accepted and relied upon for passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was accepted and relied upon for passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Report of Expert Engineer
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was accepted and relied upon for passing the final decree.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 03/11/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunu S. vs Sumathi et al regarding partition of property
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Final Decree Application Defendant Won