Similar Cases
Based on: FDA.No. 1711/2022 — Case between Xavier @ Suresh vs Valsan @ Banedict regarding partition of property
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.No.1085/2010
Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Mini is the petitioner seeking relief through a Final Decree Application, while Jalaja kumari and others are the defendants. The case was heard but the petitioner failed to appear, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA 1351/2022
Case between Sunu S. vs Sumathi et al regarding partition of property
Sunu S. filed a petition for a final decree of partition of property following a preliminary decree. The defendants, Sumathi and others, did not appear in court.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 160/2013
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
Lissy, the plaintiff, filed a final decree application in an earlier civil suit for partition of property. The court has heard the petition and is finalizing the partition based on a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 291/2015
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
The plaintiffs, Swarnavalli and others, filed an application for a final decree regarding the partition of property as per earlier orders. The court decided on the allotment of shares among the parties based on a commission report and survey plan.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 303/2020
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
This case involves a petition for passing a final decree regarding the partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs are seeking to effectuate a division of the property as per a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 491/2016
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
This case involves Suresh Kumar as the plaintiff and Sunilkumar K.K., Sujitha Bhai, and Sunitha as the defendants. They are involved in a property partition dispute regarding the allocation of shares in certain lands.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 307/2023
Case between Mini et al vs Robin regarding dismissal of petition
The case involves plaintiffs Mini, Renjini, and Jayini against defendant Robin regarding a petition that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners. The court noted repeated opportunities were provided to the petitioner to take necessary steps.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 248/2000
Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
The petitioner, Sathi, and the respondent, Shalini Manilal, have settled their disputes through mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement and passed a final decree according to its terms.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 448/2017
Case between Vysakh. S. Kumar vs Sandhya et al regarding Final Decree Application
The case involves Vysakh. S. Kumar as the petitioner against Sandhya and others regarding a final decree application. The court dismissed the application for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
Final Decree Appln. 7/2023 in O.S. No. 131/2019
Case between Athira Ajayan et al vs Sasidharan Pillai et al regarding petition for final decree
Athira Ajayan and others are petitioners in a final decree application against Sasidharan Pillai and others. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 341/2018
Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application
Sudarsanan Pillai filed a final decree application against Sudharmini and others. The court dismissed the application for default due to failure to file the necessary commission application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 409/2021
Case between Harikumar et al vs Sreekumar regarding metes and bounds partition
The plaintiffs, Harikumar, Sreekumari, and Bindhu, seek a final decree for partitioning property after a preliminary decree awarded them 3/4 share. The defendant, Sreekumar, remained absent and was set exparte during the proceedings.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.305/2010
Case between Philomina Rajan et al vs Joy Bai et al regarding passing of final decree
The petitioners, Philomina Rajan and Rajan, are seeking a final decree in a partition case. The respondents include Joy Bai and others, and the case involves allotting shares of property as per the commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S 223/2019
Case between Sindhu vs Binu regarding Final Decree Application
Sindhu is the petitioner and Binu is the respondent. The Final Decree application was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
OS.695/2021
Case between Sarojini.K.P et al vs Vikraman et al regarding partition of property.
The case involves a partition of property originally belonging to Chellappan. The plaintiffs and defendants, being children of Chellappan and Thankamma, sought to divide the inherited property following their parents' intestate deaths.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
F.D.A No.4/2024
Case between Saranya Rajesh and Others vs Yashoda Mani @ Manju, Saran Mani regarding Final Decree Application dismissal
This case involves a Final Decree Application dismissal as not pressed by the court
Final Decree Application
O.S No. 539/2010
Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Padmini filed a Final Decree Application against Purushothaman and others. The court dismissed the application as not pressed.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
RCP.No.52/2022
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
R.Vijayakumar filed a petition against Arun Mohan regarding non-compliance with a previous court order related to a rental property. The court ordered Arun Mohan to put R.Vijayakumar in possession of the building.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.60/2024
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
Ashraf Ali filed a rent control petition against Badhusha. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Rent Control Petition
Defendant Won
O.P (Pauper) 01/2022
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
The case involves Sreedevi as the plaintiff seeking money from Mahesh, the defendant. The application was filed for the realization of money, and Sreedevi claimed to be unable to pay court fees.
Application in Pauper Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.183/2025
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
Anitha Kumari.L.K and her children are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Madhu.S and Gangadevi. The case involves restraining the defendants from making constructions in certain properties until a specified date.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2023
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. initiated a suit against Justin.V.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff despite notice.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP. No. 276/2024
Case between Vivek.S vs Meenambika regarding delivery of vacant possession.
Vivek.S, the decree holder, is involved in a case against Meenambika, the judgment debtor, regarding the delivery of vacant possession of a building. The court appointed an Amin to facilitate the delivery.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.182/2025
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M., is seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Rajan, to prevent interference with the plaint scheduled property. The court was satisfied that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.184/2025
Case between Asok Kumar et al vs Vinaya Chandran et al regarding injunction
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.366/2020
Case between Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu vs Sudha regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu, was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.704/2017
Case between W. Selvaraj vs Sam Raj et al regarding rejection of plaint
W. Selvaraj is the plaintiff who brought the case against Sam Raj and Kala Suresh regarding a civil matter. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1000/2021
Case between Rajagopal vs Mani Mekhala regarding IA.No.5/2021
This case involves Rajagopal as the defendant and Mani Mekhala as the plaintiff. The court is addressing an interim application regarding certain disputes between the parties.
Plaintiff Won