Case Summary
Anitha Kumari.L.K and her children are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Madhu.S and Gangadevi. The case involves restraining the defendants from making constructions in certain properties until a specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from making constructions.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from making any constructions until a specified date. A notice was issued to the defendants regarding this order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that any delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court was satisfied that any delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court was satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants from making any type of constructions or modifications in the plaint B and C scheduled properties until 17/02/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anitha Kumari.L.K
- Relation
- W/o Late Devy.S
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ancy.A
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- D/o Anitha Kumari
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nancy.A
- Party Age
- 14
- Relation
- D/o Anitha Kumari
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madhu.S
- Relation
- S/o Sreedharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gangadevi
- Relation
- W/o Madhu.S
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vellayani V.P. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Suja.G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.V.S.Bhadra
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from making any type of constructions or modifications in the plaint B and C scheduled properties without providing statutory set back from the plaint A scheduled property
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit. Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants from making any type of constructions or modifications in the plaint B and C scheduled properties without providing statutory set back from the plaint A scheduled property as Kerala Municipality Building Rules and to cause any damage and mischief in the plaint A scheduled property until 17/02/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025