Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by T. Sathyan against T.V. Bahulayan Panicker. The petitioner seeks an injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing access to his property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from making constructions that obstruct access.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the petitioner, preventing the defendant from making constructions that would obstruct access to the petitioner's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case and delay in granting injunction would defeat the purpose.
The petitioner made out a prima facie case and delay in granting injunction would defeat the purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case and delay in granting injunction would defeat the purpose.
The petitioner made out a prima facie case and delay in granting injunction would defeat the purpose.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/ plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant and his henchmen from making any constructions annexing petition B schedule pathway thereby obstructing the ingress and egress to petition A schedule property through petition B schedule pathway by the petitioner until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T. Sathyan
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.V. Bahulayan Panicker
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.S. Rajeev Chempakassery
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner and his henchmen from making any constructions annexing petition B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant and his henchmen from making any constructions annexing petition B schedule pathway thereby obstructing the ingress and egress to petition A schedule property through petition B schedule pathway by the petitioner until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was perused by the court to determine the prima facie case.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaint was perused by the court to determine the prima facie case.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025