Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Raji and Sathi Kumar, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, R.Uma Shankar. The case involves a dispute over property where the plaintiffs are attempting to prevent the defendant from ousting them from their shop room.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from ousting the plaintiff from the property and alienating existing stock.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has restrained the defendant from ousting the plaintiff from the property and from alienating the existing stock in the shop room.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff made a prima facie case and showed balance of convenience and irreparable injury in their favor.
The plaintiff made a prima facie case and showed balance of convenience and irreparable injury in their favor.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that plaintiff has made of a prima facie case and balance of convenience and irreparable injury is in this favour.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence respondent/ defendant is restrained by a temporary injunction from ousting plaintiff from plaint schedule property from alienating existing stock in plaint schedule property until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raji
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sathi Kumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.Uma Shankar
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.A,Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Ajaisarma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Meera Chandran.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Rekha.S.Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the defendant from ousting the plaintiff from plaint schedule property and alienating existing stock in plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence respondent/ defendant is restrained by a temporary injunction from ousting plaintiff from plaint schedule property from alienating existing stock in plaint schedule property until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024