Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed certain interim applications and ruled that the case should be returned for presentation before the proper court as per the Code of Civil Procedure. This indicates a procedural order rather than a final judgment on the merits of the case.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is having been finally heard on 31.01.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following JUDGMENT.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathai.P.G
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Binu V.George
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- G.Yohannan
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indian Pentecostal Church of God
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The General Council of The Indian Pentecostal Church of God
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The President (General council) The Indian Pentecostal Church of God
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.Unnikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Swaroop Mohan.C.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A.Vahab
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V. Bhuvanendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Liyah A.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Rohit C.Oommen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Preethi Annie Alex
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sandhya Satheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Aami Jalal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B.Sathiq
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Revathy.S.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA 9/2024 allowed.
Evidence:
IA 9/2024 allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA 7/2024 allowed.
Evidence:
IA 7/2024 allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
IA 11/2024 dismissed.
Evidence:
IA 11/2024 dismissed vide separate order.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaint returned for presentation before proper court.
Evidence:
Plaint returned for presentation before proper court U/s Order 7 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings