Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.194/2025

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
Case Code No.
194
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendant from transferring shares until further notice.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from removing or transferring certain stocks and shares.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendant from transferring shares until further notice.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/ defendant from removing, alienating, selling or transferring the stock and share of late Vasantha Pillay which was kept in the Demat account No.1208670001323727 with HDFC securities until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepti Sivan
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nair Ajay Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vishnu.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vaisakh Subodhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner from removing, alienating, selling or transferring the stock and share of late Vasantha Pillay.
Evidence:
the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit to make a determination.
Reference:
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court reviewed the plaint as part of the case.
Reference:
Document Type: Other Documents
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Other unspecified documents were reviewed by the court.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won