Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.394/2019

Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
Case Code No.
394
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was returned for presenting it before the appropriate court. The plaintiff was granted the liberty to make an application to the court if desired.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was returned for presenting it before the appropriate court. The plaintiff was granted the liberty to make an application to the court if desired.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was allowed to be returned for proper jurisdiction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the proper court for the suit was not the one in which it was originally filed.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is returned U/o.VII Rule 10 Code of the Civil Procedure for presenting it before court in which it should have been instituted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
All India Sports Council for Deaf
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Deaf Cricket Society
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumit Jain
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antichen.K.J.
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Pazhania Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.Binu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Satheesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Hariprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.S.Sukumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sandeep.T.George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won