Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 341/2018

Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sudarsanan Pillai filed a final decree application against Sudharmini and others. The court dismissed the application for default due to failure to file the necessary commission application.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The final decree application was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to file a commission application despite being granted repeated opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The final decree application was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to file a commission application despite being granted repeated opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to comply with the court's directive to file a commission application.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to comply with the court's directive to file a commission application.
Supporting Evidence
It is noted that repeated opportunities granted. Even then commission application is not filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudarsanan Pillai
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudharmini
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sangeetha
Party Age
16
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suraj
Party Age
12
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Shihabudheen Kuriyedath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Remesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Sindhu Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the commission application due to default in filing.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application
Case Code Year
Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mini et al vs Robin regarding dismissal of petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Final Decree Application Plaintiff Won