Case Summary
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs, stopping the defendants from making additional constructions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case for the plaintiffs and determined that delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose.
The court found a prima facie case for the plaintiffs and determined that delaying the injunction would defeat its purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners/plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from making any further constructions in the petition B schedule property in violation of KMBR and without obtaining permit and plan from the Corporation or from making any hindrance to the outer northern building wall of the petition A and C schedule properties.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asok Kumar
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shaji
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinaya Chandran
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinisha Chandran
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreejith
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.S.Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sree Lekha.I.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ashiq Mohamed.A.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Akhil.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Nadeer Muhammed.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mahadev.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from making any further constructions in the petition B schedule property.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioners/plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025