Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1043/2017

Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Code No.
1043
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit and counterclaim have been dismissed. The court found no grounds to grant the reliefs sought by the plaintiff and defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit and counterclaim have been dismissed. The court found no grounds to grant the reliefs sought by the plaintiff and defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The evidence and pleadings indicated no entitlement to the claims made by the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The evidence and pleadings indicated no entitlement to the claims made by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff and defendants 2 to 5 have not established their rights to the property, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: (a) The suit is dismissed. (b) The counter claim filed by the 2nd defendant is dismissed. (c) The counter claim filed by the defendants 3 to 5 are also dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stansilas
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul Racious
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annakutty Gilbert
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geethu Gilbert
Party Age
24
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gilbert
Party Age
50
Relation
H/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Sale deed No.1430/1974, Certified Copy of Settlement deed No.2914/1997, Original premium receipt issued by Star Health and Allied Insurance Company, Original receipts issued by Santha Paints House, Certificate issued by Dr.Anas M.B.B.S, Taluk Hospital, Kadakkal, Death Certificate of Sri. Kolanthaswamy, Ration card bearing No. 1101087955, Copy of the complaint to the City Police Commissioner, Copies of the complaints to the Circle Inspector of Police, Poonthura Police Station.
Defendants Documents
Original of Settlement deed No.2914/1997, Land tax receipts, Property tax receipts, Possession certificate, Ownership Certificate, Original rent agreements, Original Passport, Approved building plan.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Vikraman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.G.S. Sanal Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.S. Raj Girish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Punchakkary G. Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Counter Claim Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Vikraman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
The reliefs sought in the plaint are not allowable.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim for declaration of title to the property.
Evidence:
The counter claim filed by the defendants 3 to 5 are also dismissed.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Seek possession of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The counter claim filed by the defendants 3 to 5 are also dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate ownership of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Allegedly a fabricated document related to the claims of defendants 3 and 4.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original premium receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced as evidence by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used for reference in supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series
Document Type: Certificate issued by Dr. Anas
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided as part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the death of the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Ration Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of the complaint to the City Police Commissioner
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidenced attempts to secure protection against eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A8 series
Document Type: Copies of complaints to the Circle Inspector of Police
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supported the plaintiff's claims regarding unlawful eviction attempts.
Reference:
Ext.A9 series
Document Type: Copies of complaints to the Circle Inspector of Police
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated continued issues surrounding eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A10 series
Document Type: Original of Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Claimed by defendants as evidence of their ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used to confirm tax payments related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2(a)
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further documentation of property tax records.
Reference:
Ext.B2(b)
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided as evidence of ownership and tax compliance.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further documentation of property tax records.
Reference:
Ext.B3(a)
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further documentation of property tax records.
Reference:
Ext.B3(b)
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further documentation of property tax records.
Reference:
Ext.B3(c)
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Claimed as evidence of the defendants' control over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Electricity Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Demonstrated ongoing utility payments by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B5 series
Document Type: Water Bill
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Demonstrated ongoing utility payments by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B6 series
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used to verify ownership claims by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided evidence of rental agreements related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided evidence of rental agreements related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided evidence of rental agreements related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Original Passport
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Identified as a valid form of identification.
Reference:
Ext.B11
Document Type: Approved building plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supported claims regarding the construction of the building.
Reference:
Ext.B12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won