Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP.No.52/2022

Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building

Court
Rent Control Court
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-01
Duration
Case Code No.
52
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

R.Vijayakumar filed a petition against Arun Mohan regarding non-compliance with a previous court order related to a rental property. The court ordered Arun Mohan to put R.Vijayakumar in possession of the building.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the respondent, Arun Mohan, willfully failed to comply with a court order and directed him to put the petitioner in possession of the building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of petition schedule building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent, Arun Mohan, willfully failed to comply with a court order and directed him to put the petitioner in possession of the building.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the court order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the court order.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the respondent has willfully not complied with the order.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of petition schedule building under section 12 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act 1965.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R.Vijayakumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Seetha Lekshmi.B
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o.R.Vijayakumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun Mohan
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Registered rent agreement bearing No.3218/2011 dated 27-08-2011
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Thonnakkal.G.Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Jyothsna.G.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajith Kumar.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Malavika.A.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joseph Stephenson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of petition schedule building.
Evidence:
Hence the further proceedings in RCP is hereby stopped and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of petition schedule building under section 12 (3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act 1965.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between R.Vinayan vs James Fletcher regarding eviction
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Sulabha.C.S. vs James Fletcher regarding review of eviction order
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between B.Pushpa Kumari et al vs P.Gomathy et al regarding rent control petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between B.Vinitha vs Shalini.A.M. regarding Rent Control petition
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Anzar Jamaludeen vs Sukumari.M.L et al regarding production of thumb impression register
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won