Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. 248/2014 — Case between Sree Raj et al vs Daisy et al regarding lifting of property attachment
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S. 506/2017
Case between Francis et al vs Manager, Gramin Bank regarding lifting of attachment
This case involves a husband and wife, Francis and Binu Mol, who filed a petition to lift an attachment on their property. The Bank and a defendant named Suseela contested the petition, claiming the property was not described correctly.
Claim Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 120/ 2025
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
The petitioners, Balachandran and others, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, Sajith and others, to prevent encroachment on their property. The court has found prima facie evidence indicating that irreparable injury may occur without the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 483/ 2024
Case between Sajitha. M. vs Sasi et al regarding temporary injunction.
Sajitha M. filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Sasi and others to prevent them from encroaching on property and controlling a family temple. The defendants claimed to be the temple protection committee and argued they had rightful control.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 97/2025
Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction
Mable Martin, the petitioner, seeks an injunction against Juliet. D. Kotha, the defendant, to prevent encroachment on property and construction of a new pathway. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioner.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 87/2025
Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction
Dr. Raseena Beevi is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Shelly Verkey John and Shakkeela regarding property encroachment. The court found a prima facie case and the need to prevent irreparable injury.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 64/ 2025
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
The petitioner Sreedevi Amma. G. is seeking an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing her use of a pathway. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioner, indicating potential irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 64/2025
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Sreedevi Amma. G. is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, G. Sreekumari Amma and T.V. Manikantan Nair, regarding the obstruction of a pathway. The court has determined that a prima facie case is made out.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 401/2021
Case between Azhakumurukan vs Sarojini regarding status quo maintenance
Azhakumurukan filed a petition against Sarojini regarding the maintenance of status quo as per the commission report dated 08/02/2022. The court has directed both parties to maintain the status quo.
Civil Suit
O.S. 47/ 2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction against business interference.
Arun. B.R. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd. The court is addressing a request for temporary relief to prevent interference in the plaintiff's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 47/2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction.
Arun. B.R. is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd and its director Mahesh Michael. The court found a prima facie case and granted temporary relief to prevent interference with the petitioner's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 33/ 2025
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Asokan and Vijayakumari, are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Leela, to prevent her from encroaching on their property and using it as a pathway. The court heard the petition and found a prima facie case for granting the injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 33/2025
Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
The plaintiffs Asokan and Vijayakumari are seeking an interim injunction against the defendant Leela to prevent her from encroaching on their property and causing irreparable harm. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 39/ 2021
Case between Geetha et al vs Anzar et al regarding removal of suit from the list.
The plaintiffs Geetha, Greeshma, and Gokul filed a petition to remove a suit from the list. The court found the petition devoid of merits and dismissed it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 32/2025
Case between Davood Abu vs Navas et al regarding injunction.
Davood Abu has filed a petition against Navas and others seeking an injunction to prevent encroachment on his property. The court found sufficient grounds to issue a temporary order restraining the defendants.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 354/2022
Case between Sarojam vs R. S. Gandhi regarding specific performance of an agreement for sale
The petitioner Sarojam seeks to amend her plaint to include her readiness and willingness to perform her part of a sale agreement with the respondent R. S. Gandhi. The defendant argues that the plaintiff was not ready and willing to fulfill her obligations under the contract.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 354/ 2022
Case between Sarojam vs R. S. Gandhi regarding specific performance of an agreement for sale
The plaintiff, Sarojam, seeks specific performance of a sale agreement against the defendant, R. S. Gandhi, claiming readiness and willingness to perform her part of the contract. The defendant argues that the plaintiff was not ready and willing as per the agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 25/2025
Case between Dr. M. S. Lekha et al vs Dawood regarding injunction
Dr. M. S. Lekha, M.S. Saju, and Dr. Haleena Shah are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Dawood regarding property matters. The court heard the petition for an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from encroaching on the petitioners' property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 26/2025
Case between Afna vs Shihabudheen et al regarding injunction
Afna is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Shihabudheen and others. The case involves a dispute over encroachment and obstruction of property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 348/2017
Case between Beena. V vs Saji Mytheenkunju regarding review of previous order
Beena. V filed a petition for reviewing a prior order dismissing her application under section 340 of the Cr.P.C against Saji Mytheenkunju. The review petition was filed because of alleged contradictions in the respondent's previous statements.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 466/ 2017
Case between Reeja. S. vs Saji Moitheenkunju regarding review of a prior court order
Reeja. S. is the petitioner seeking a review of a dismissed petition against Saji Moitheenkunju. The review concerns allegations of false statements made by the respondent and involves prior police complaints.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 165/ 2022
Case between M.S. Krishnakumar et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding I.A. 7/2025
The petitioners are M.S. Krishnakumar and others, who seek to appoint an advocate commissioner for the suit. The respondents include the State of Kerala and several government officials.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 228/ 2025
Case between Dr. K. Vijayan vs Irana Veeran regarding injunction
Dr. K. Vijayan is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Irana Veeran. The court considered the petitioner's request for relief due to potential irreparable injury.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 451/ 2025
Case between Padmaja vs Geethakumari et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Padmaja is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against Geethakumari and others regarding a property matter. The court found a prima facie case and granted injunction due to potential irreparable harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 404/ 2025
Case between Ambika vs Lissy et al regarding injunction.
Ambika is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Lissy and others. The court found a prima facie case for granting the injunction to prevent harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 394/2025
Case between Baiju.T.S vs Arun Nadarajan et al regarding injunction on encroachment
The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, Baiju.T.S and Seena.D.S, and the respondents, Arun Nadarajan and Jayasree Arun, regarding an injunction to prevent encroachment on property. The court found that a prima facie case was made out.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S.92/2022
Case between Najimudheen vs Raji. S. Nair regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
Najimudheen, the petitioner, seeks to set aside an exparte decree issued against him in a money realization suit. Raji. S. Nair, the respondent, opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner had failed to present sufficient cause for his absence during the original proceedings.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
EA No. 01/2025
Case between Aby Mathew Varghese et al vs St. George Chitties Pvt Ltd. et al regarding Claim Petition.
The case involves claim petitioners Aby Mathew Varghese and Anna Reba John against respondents St. George Chitties Pvt Ltd. and others. The petition was filed under order XXI Rule 58 and was heard on August 1, 2025.
Claim Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S.409/2014
Case between Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy vs Shyla Daniel et al regarding acceptance of documents
The case involves Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy as the plaintiff seeking acceptance of certain documents in a civil suit. The defendants counter that the plaintiff is not prosecuting the case and that prior petitions were dismissed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 343/2025
Case between Nandana.R.P vs Biju Kumar.S et al regarding temporary injunction for lateral support
Nandana.R.P and Rajesh Kumar.S are the plaintiffs seeking a temporary injunction against Biju Kumar.S, Jiji K.S, and Radhadevi, the defendants. The plaintiffs claim damage to their property due to soil excavation by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.1333/2021
Case between Renjitha V.R vs Anieamma Mathews K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Renjitha V.R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the legal heirs of her deceased landlord Reji Joseph. The case involves allegations of forged rental agreements and seeks to prevent her eviction from the tenanted premises.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 156/ 2025
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
The case involves A. Shahjahan and others as plaintiffs against Shaji and Krishna Kumar regarding a petition for an injunction related to property encroachment. The court finds that a prima facie case exists for granting an interim injunction to prevent irreparable injury to the plaintiffs.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/2021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The case involves Ayisha Beevi as the plaintiff, represented by her son Navas, against defendants Noushad and Shajahan. The court is hearing a petition regarding an injunction to prevent the defendants from alienating certain property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 147/2025
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
Anoop. P is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Lissy. P. S, the respondent. The court determined that a prima facie case was made out and granted a temporary injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP.No 15/2024 IN OS No. 59//2008
Case between Udha vs Chandramgathan et al regarding execution of decree.
The plaintiffs, Udha and a deceased party Ponnamma, are executing a decree against the defendants, which include Chandramgathan and his legal heirs. The court found that the execution petition has been satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won