Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 25/2025

Case between Dr. M. S. Lekha et al vs Dawood regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration
Case Code No.
25
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. M. S. Lekha, M.S. Saju, and Dr. Haleena Shah are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Dawood regarding property matters. The court heard the petition for an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from encroaching on the petitioners' property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court issued an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, restraining him from trespassing or encroaching on the petitioners' property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing on the property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court issued an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, restraining him from trespassing or encroaching on the petitioners' property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case and determined that irreparable injury would occur without the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case and determined that irreparable injury would occur without the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from trespassing or encroaching into petition schedule property further restrained from committing any act of waster therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. M. S. Lekha
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.S. Saju
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Haleena Shah
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dawood
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Ramesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from trespassing or encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioners.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won