Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 97/2025

Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
Case Code No.
97
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mable Martin, the petitioner, seeks an injunction against Juliet. D. Kotha, the defendant, to prevent encroachment on property and construction of a new pathway. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the respondent from encroaching on the petitioner's property and from cutting a new pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against encroachment and pathway construction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the respondent from encroaching on the petitioner's property and from cutting a new pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established, indicating potential irreparable injury from delay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was established, indicating potential irreparable injury from delay.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit. If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from cutting open a new pathway through the petition schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mable Martin
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Juliet. D. Kotha
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from encroaching into the petition schedule property and further restrained from cutting open a new pathway through the petition schedule property until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Davood Abu vs Navas et al regarding injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won