Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 87/2025

Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Code No.
87
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. Raseena Beevi is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Shelly Verkey John and Shakkeela regarding property encroachment. The court found a prima facie case and the need to prevent irreparable injury.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction to Dr. Raseena Beevi, restraining the defendants from encroaching on her property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction to Dr. Raseena Beevi, restraining the defendants from encroaching on her property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case is made out and the delay in notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and committing any act of waste further restrained from opening of new pathways and widening of existing pathways until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Raseena Beevi
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shelly Verkey John
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shakkeela
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit, and documents produced.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. A.S. Noushad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and committing any act of waste further restrained from opening of new pathways and widening of existing pathways until further order.
Evidence:
the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and committing any act of waste further restrained from opening of new pathways and widening of existing pathways until further order

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Davood Abu vs Navas et al regarding injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won