Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 32/2025

Case between Davood Abu vs Navas et al regarding injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-01-18
Duration
Case Code No.
32
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Davood Abu has filed a petition against Navas and others seeking an injunction to prevent encroachment on his property. The court found sufficient grounds to issue a temporary order restraining the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has temporarily restrained the respondents from encroaching on the petitioner's property until further orders are issued.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted against the defendants.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has temporarily restrained the respondents from encroaching on the petitioner's property until further orders are issued.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out demonstrating the risk of irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Davood Abu
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Navas
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabeer
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sakeer @ PDP Sakeer
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabu @ Ambulance Sabu
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haris
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sunil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won