Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 26/2025

Case between Afna vs Shihabudheen et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration
Case Code No.
26
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Afna is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Shihabudheen and others. The case involves a dispute over encroachment and obstruction of property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching on the petitioner's property and obstructing the pathway. This order aims to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Injunction against encroachment and obstruction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching on the petitioner's property and obstructing the pathway. This order aims to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established indicating potential irreparable harm.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition A schedule property and petition B schedule pathway and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Afna
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihabudheen
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihabudheen
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nizar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. P. Sarith Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition A schedule property and petition B schedule pathway and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are further restrained from obstructing petition B schedule pathway in any manner until further order.
Evidence:
Respondents are further restrained from obstructing petition B schedule pathway in any manner until further order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won