Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 348/2017

Case between Beena. V vs Saji Mytheenkunju regarding review of previous order

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months
Case Code No.
348
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Beena. V filed a petition for reviewing a prior order dismissing her application under section 340 of the Cr.P.C against Saji Mytheenkunju. The review petition was filed because of alleged contradictions in the respondent's previous statements.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for review filed by Beena. V against Saji Mytheenkunju, stating that the grounds for review were not valid. Both parties were instructed to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for review filed by Beena. V against Saji Mytheenkunju, stating that the grounds for review were not valid. Both parties were instructed to bear their own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The petition lacked merits and the grounds urged were not applicable for a review under the relevant law.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition lacked merits and the grounds urged were not applicable for a review under the relevant law.
Supporting Evidence
The grounds urged by the review petitioner will not come under the purview of O.47 R.1 of the C.P.C., 1908. So the petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beena. V
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji Mytheenkunju
Party Age
49
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.M. Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Senil. R. Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Review petition for the order in I.A.2439/2018 dated 11.07.2019
Evidence:
So the petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Tue, 07/11/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sajitha. M. vs Sasi et al regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won