Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.1333/2021

Case between Renjitha V.R vs Anieamma Mathews K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-12-05
Duration
approximately-4 years 4 months
Case Code No.
1333
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Renjitha V.R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are the legal heirs of her deceased landlord Reji Joseph. The case involves allegations of forged rental agreements and seeks to prevent her eviction from the tenanted premises.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for forensic investigation of the original rental deed and receipt submitted by the plaintiff. It determined that such an investigation was necessary to resolve the disputes over the authenticity of the documents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Original of rental deed dated 7/1/2021 and original of receipt dated 20-04-2021 to be sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for forensic investigation of the original rental deed and receipt submitted by the plaintiff. It determined that such an investigation was necessary to resolve the disputes over the authenticity of the documents.
Key Reasoning:
The court found it expedient for justice to allow forensic investigation to determine disputes over document authenticity.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found it expedient for justice to allow forensic investigation to determine disputes over document authenticity.
Supporting Evidence
It is expedient in the interest of justice that a forensic investigation is to be conducted for the purpose of determining the real disputes between the parties in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: (1) original of rental deed dated 7/1/2021 and (2) original of receipt dated 20-04-2021 produced by the plaintiff in the above suit and the original of subscription voucher no. IVRS7718955555 dated 10-02-2021 of the Indian Oil Corporation produced by the defendants to the Forensic Science Laboratory.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Renjitha V.R
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o Shibu P.R
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anieamma Mathews K
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Late Reji Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujith Joseph Philip
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o Late Reji Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith Joseph Philip
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o Late Reji Joseph
Plaintiffs Documents
original rental deed dated 07/01/2021, original of receipt dated 20/04/2021, copy of advocate notice dated 01/09/2021
Defendants Documents
original subscription voucher no. IVRS7718955555 dated 10-02-2021 of the Indian Oil Corporation

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Dougles Linsby.N.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Jayamohan.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court allowed the petition to send specific documents to the Forensic Science Laboratory for examination.
Evidence:
Therefore, this court is of the view that the petition is liable to be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rental Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was produced by the plaintiff to establish the tenancy.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was produced by the plaintiff as evidence of payment.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was produced by the plaintiff to notify the defendants regarding the suit.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Subscription Voucher
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was produced by the defendants for forensic comparison to challenge the signatures on the other documents.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 08/12/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nandana.R.P vs Biju Kumar.S et al regarding temporary injunction for lateral support
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy vs Shyla Daniel et al regarding acceptance of documents
Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won