Case Summary
The case involves Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy as the plaintiff seeking acceptance of certain documents in a civil suit. The defendants counter that the plaintiff is not prosecuting the case and that prior petitions were dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for accepting additional documents was allowed by the court, stating it was maintainable despite previous dismissals.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petition maintainable as it was not barred by previous decisions.
The court found the petition maintainable as it was not barred by previous decisions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petition maintainable as it was not barred by previous decisions.
The court found the petition maintainable as it was not barred by previous decisions.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that this petition filed by the pleader for the party is very well maintainable and not barred by the principle of Estoppel or res judicata and the petition is liable to be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devi Nagar-Idakkulam-Karoorkonam Road Vikasana Samithy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyla Daniel
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariamma Daniel
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Daniel Zachariah
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh Kumar.O.S @ Unni
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Deepak.J.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Dhanya.U.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vishnu Hari.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.David Varghese Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Premjith.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Suja.G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sarga.G.Sajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Jayachnadran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.D.Arun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abhijith.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition filed by the pleader for accepting the documents was allowed.
Evidence:
Hence I am of the view that this petition filed by the pleader for the party is very well maintainable and not barred by the principle of Estoppel or res judicata and the petition is liable to be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Documents
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioner/plaintiff's counsel filed for accepting 12 documents to substantiate the claims made in the suit.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2014