Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 248/2014

Case between Sree Raj et al vs Daisy et al regarding lifting of property attachment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
approximately-11 years 5 months
Case Code No.
248
Case Closed
Thu, 10/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners Sree Raj and Sreelal are siblings who filed a claim petition to lift an attachment on their property. Respondents Daisy and Damayanthi contest their ownership of the property, claiming the petitioners do not have rights over it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioners' request to lift the attachment on their property, affirming their ownership. Costs were directed to be borne by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The attachment order entered in the claim petition schedule property as per the order in I.A.1373/2014 dated 07.05.2014 is hereby lifted.
Case Type
Claim Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioners' request to lift the attachment on their property, affirming their ownership. Costs were directed to be borne by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioners have established ownership over the property in question.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the petitioners have established ownership over the property in question.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that the attachment order passed against the claim petition schedule property can be lifted. Point No.1 is found in favour of the petitioners and found against the respondents.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed as follows: 1. The attachment order entered in the claim petition schedule property as per the order in I.A.1373/2014 of the Hon'ble Vacation Court, Thiruvananthapuram dated 07.05.2014 is hereby lifted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Raj
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreelal
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Daisy
Party Age
56
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Damayanthi
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No. 3319/2009, Tax receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Smart
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.V. Shinu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vakkom R. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Lifting of the attachment order against the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
The court is of the view that the attachment order passed against the claim petition schedule property can be lifted.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the purchase of the petition schedule property by the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms that the property was attached as per court order.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a sketch of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents provide visual evidence of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A8 (series)
Document Type: Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This document evidences the ownership status of the property related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Claim Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Francis et al vs Manager, Gramin Bank regarding lifting of attachment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Claim Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won