Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 394/2025

Case between Baiju.T.S vs Arun Nadarajan et al regarding injunction on encroachment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P
Order Date
2025-11-12
Duration
Case Code No.
394
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, Baiju.T.S and Seena.D.S, and the respondents, Arun Nadarajan and Jayasree Arun, regarding an injunction to prevent encroachment on property. The court found that a prima facie case was made out.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court issued an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from encroaching on the petitioners' property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against encroachment
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court issued an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from encroaching on the petitioners' property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established showing that irreparable injury would occur if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was established showing that irreparable injury would occur if the injunction was not granted.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the counter petitioners are restrained from, encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baiju.T.S
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Seena.D.S
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun Nadarajan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayasree Arun
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B. L.Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction against the counter petitioners restraining them from encroaching into petition schedule property and committing any act of waste therein.
Evidence:
the counter petitioners are restrained from, encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Kollam
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Asokan et al vs Leela regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Asokan vs Leela regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding injunction for pathway use.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Raseena Beevi vs Shelly Verkey John et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mable Martin vs Juliet. D. Kotha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won