Case Summary
Reeja. S. is the petitioner seeking a review of a dismissed petition against Saji Moitheenkunju. The review concerns allegations of false statements made by the respondent and involves prior police complaints.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for review of the earlier order, indicating that the petition did not meet the criteria for reviewing a prior decision.
Key Reasoning:
The petition did not reveal any apparent error in the previous order or present new and important evidence.
The petition did not reveal any apparent error in the previous order or present new and important evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition did not reveal any apparent error in the previous order or present new and important evidence.
The petition did not reveal any apparent error in the previous order or present new and important evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The grounds urged by the review petitioner is not coming under the purview of O.47 R.1 of C.P.C, 1908. So this court is having no hesitation to conclude that the petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reeja. S.
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o Late Lissy Kumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saji Moitheenkunju
- Party Age
- 49
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Pradeep lal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Senil. R. Nath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Review
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The review petition filed for reviewing the order in I.A.1721/2018 dated 10.06.2019 was dismissed.
Evidence:
So this court is having no hesitation to conclude that the petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The court found that both parties can be directed to suffer their respective costs.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the petition, both parties can be directed to suffer their respective costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2017