Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 165/ 2022

Case between M.S. Krishnakumar et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding I.A. 7/2025

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
approximately-3 years
Case Code No.
165
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners are M.S. Krishnakumar and others, who seek to appoint an advocate commissioner for the suit. The respondents include the State of Kerala and several government officials.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for appointing an advocate commissioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Adv. Mr. D. Roy is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for appointing an advocate commissioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court considered the materials and deemed it essential to appoint an advocate commissioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court considered the materials and deemed it essential to appoint an advocate commissioner.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that deputing an advocate commissioner with the assistance of a surveyor is highly essential for a just disposal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is allowed and Adv. Mr. D. Roy is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.S. Krishnakumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Padmakumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Liji
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by Chief Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Collector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tahsildar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Village Officer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Director of Survey and Land Records
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Smart
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Swapna. C. Nair
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed for appointing an advocate commissioner.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed and Adv. Mr. D. Roy is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court passed an order allowing the petition for appointing an advocate commissioner.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Sat, 06/18/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Sarala Devi vs The State of Kerala et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jaseem vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Saifudeen vs State of Kerala regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Salim. M et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding petition for temporary injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won