Original Suit No.13/2018

Case between Jaseem vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND P.

Order Date

2025-11-13

Duration

approximately-7 years

Case Closed

Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jaseem is the plaintiff who filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of steps taken for adducing evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit filed by Jaseem was dismissed due to his absence and failure to present evidence.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court and failed to take necessary steps to present evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court and failed to take necessary steps to present evidence.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff absent. No representation. No steps taken for adducing evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Jaseem
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: State of Kerala
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Assistant Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Sub Division

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Assistant Engineer, P.W.D. Road Section

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: T.U. Cheriyan, Contractor, Thiruvarathu Builders

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.M.B. Vijayan Babu
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Niyas A. Salam
Appearance Type: Main Counsel
Law Firm: Pleader to do Government Work, at Varkala.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Evidence: