Similar Cases
Based on: OS 387/2025 — Case between Muhammed Fari vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding temporary injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No.1933/2023
Case between Socialist Republican Party et al vs The United Democratic Front et al regarding dismissal for default
The case involves the Socialist Republican Party represented by O.V. Sreedath as the plaintiff against the United Democratic Front and several other defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiffs were absent and did not take any steps after repeated directions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1340/2016
Case between Socialist Republican Party (SRP) et al vs S.Ranjith et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The Socialist Republican Party and other plaintiffs filed a suit against S.Ranjith and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not represented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 443/2023
Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Remla Sahir, filed a suit against the defendant, Shaji.V, for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges harassment and threats from the defendant regarding her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 244/2025
Case between Syamji vs Preetha et al regarding temporary injunction to prevent construction.
Syamji, the petitioner, has filed a petition against Preetha and others, seeking a temporary injunction to stop construction on adjacent property. The petitioner claims that the construction will cause damage to his property and is proceeding without the necessary permits.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 245/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lilly et al regarding interim attachment
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the plaintiff and Lilly and others as defendants regarding an interim attachment petition. The court heard the petition and decided to allow the interim attachment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 344/2024
Case between Surumi. H vs Sameena et al regarding Interim Attachment Order
Surumi. H filed a petition against Sameena and others for an interim attachment order. The court allowed the petition based on the materials presented.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 400/2024
Case between M/s Nationalist Congress Party vs Mr. Roy Varicatt regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
The case involves the Nationalist Congress Party represented by its State President, Mr. N. A Muhammed Kutty, against Mr. Roy Varicatt. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from misrepresenting himself as the State President of the party and using its symbols and flag, which has caused public confusion.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1066/2022
Case between N.A.Mohammedkutty vs Nationalist Congress Party et al regarding illegal expulsion from party
N.A.Mohammedkutty is the plaintiff who claims he was illegally expelled from the Nationalist Congress Party without following proper procedures. The defendants, including the party and its various officials, did not respond to the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.996/2020
Case between A.M. Shukur vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit.
A.M. Shukur filed a suit against multiple defendants including the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 917/2023
Case between Sudheesh Kumar S et al vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit
Sudheesh Kumar S filed a suit against the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee and others. The court has dismissed the case as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.154/2022
Case between Democratic Human Rights Movement Party et al vs Mani regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are the Democratic Human Rights Movement Party, represented by its President, and Rajan. The defendant is Mani. The case is about a suit that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS 21/2013
Case between Pushpalatha.L vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiff, Pushpalatha.L, filed a suit against Suresh and Geetha Suresh. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the lack of necessary filings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 1757/2012
Case between M.Ananthakrishnan vs N.Annamma, A.Prasanna et al regarding tenancy dispute
M.Ananthakrishnan filed a suit against N.Annamma, A.Prasanna and others regarding a tenancy dispute. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 524/2024
Case between Ninan Jacob vs Francis Edison regarding dismissal for default.
Ninan Jacob is the plaintiff, and Francis Edison is the defendant in this case. The court dismissed the suit for default as no fresh steps were taken by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 239/2022
Case between Devika.S.L. vs Nesan.P et al regarding rental control matter.
Devika.S.L. filed a suit against Nesan.P and the Managing Director of KSRTC. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 374/2023
Case between Union Bank Of India vs Asha.P.G, Geetha.A.G regarding closure of suit
The Union Bank of India represented by its Branch Manager filed the suit against Asha.P.G and Geetha.A.G. The case was finally heard and subsequently closed on the basis of a withdrawal memo and an award by Lok adalath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 1403/2020
Case between Anilkumar et al vs Vijayakumaran Nair et al regarding commission report
The case involves a petition by the plaintiffs to set aside a commission report. The defendants oppose this, stating that the plaintiffs are attempting to delay the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 372/2023
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumers Credits Limited vs Gokul G. Nair et al regarding mediation settlement
The case involves M/s. Mulamoottil Consumers Credits Limited as the plaintiff and Gokul G. Nair and others as defendants. The matter was settled through mediation, and the suit was disposed of based on the mediation report.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 642/2023
Case between Sarasamma vs Noble et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves a plaintiff, Sarasamma, and defendants Noble and Lathika. The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 137/2025
Case between Reenamony vs Remany, Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju regarding injunction
Reenamony is the petitioner seeking protection against the defendants Remany and Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju. The case involves a request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.136/2025
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 132/ 2025
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction
Kannan is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Anoob. V.R. The court determined that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 131/2025
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction
R. Snehalatha filed a petition against Sarachandra Babu seeking an injunction to prevent interference with her water access. The court determined that granting the injunction was necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 127/2025
Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment
The petitioners, Abhijith and Jalajakumari Amma, are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Mohandas, regarding the encroachment of property. The court found that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 157/2020
Case between Thajuneesa vs Mohammad fanab et al regarding petition for legal heirship
The case involves a petition filed by Roshida regarding legal heirship of the deceased plaintiff Thajuneesa. The court found that Roshida is not the sole legal heir and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 224/2022
Case between Sunil Kumar Narayanan et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sunil Kumar Narayanan and Manju Narayanan, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other authorities for a permanent prohibitory injunction. They contested the government's acquisition of their property without proper measurement and valuation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 120/ 2025
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
The petitioners, Balachandran and others, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, Sajith and others, to prevent encroachment on their property. The court has found prima facie evidence indicating that irreparable injury may occur without the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 483/ 2024
Case between Sajitha. M. vs Sasi et al regarding temporary injunction.
Sajitha M. filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Sasi and others to prevent them from encroaching on property and controlling a family temple. The defendants claimed to be the temple protection committee and argued they had rightful control.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.106/2025
Case between Subhash et al vs Binu et al regarding interim injunction
The plaintiffs, Subhash, Shyni, Soni, and Mini, are seeking an interim injunction against the defendants, Binu and Nadarajan, to prevent obstruction of access to their property. The court found a prima facie case for granting the injunction to avoid irreparable injury.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini filed a suit against M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no steps taken to adduce evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
This case involves plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini against defendants M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 433/2019
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fees.
Sainulabdeen is the plaintiff, and Sajeer is the defendant. The case revolves around the rejection of the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the necessary court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 433/ 2019
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding balance court fee
The case involves the plaintiff Sainulabdeen and defendant Sajeer regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the fee despite multiple opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won