Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 245/2023

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lilly et al regarding interim attachment

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
Case Code No.
245
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the plaintiff and Lilly and others as defendants regarding an interim attachment petition. The court heard the petition and decided to allow the interim attachment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The interim attachment petition submitted by Kerala Gramin Bank has been allowed by the court. The order is now made absolute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim attachment order is made absolute.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The interim attachment petition submitted by Kerala Gramin Bank has been allowed by the court. The order is now made absolute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the materials presented by the plaintiff sufficient to allow the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the materials presented by the plaintiff sufficient to allow the petition.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials this court is of the view that this Petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

After considering the materials this court is of the view that this Petition can be allowed. Hence interim attachment order is made absolute.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh. G. R.
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lilly
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sneha
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sobin
Party Age
17
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Ajayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Lissy Gopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ninega Dinesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
interim attachment order is made absolute
Evidence:
this court is of the view that this Petition can be allowed. Hence interim attachment order is made absolute.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Rejani. S. regarding restoration of petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs N. Rajan et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between CSB Bank Ltd. et al vs Sulatha S. et al regarding balance court fee
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs Asha.P.G, Geetha.A.G regarding closure of suit
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won