Case Summary
The Union Bank of India represented by its Branch Manager filed the suit against Asha.P.G and Geetha.A.G. The case was finally heard and subsequently closed on the basis of a withdrawal memo and an award by Lok adalath.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court acknowledged the withdrawal memo filed by the plaintiff and noted the award passed by Lok adalath, leading to the closure of the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff filed for a withdrawal which was accepted by the court.
The plaintiff filed for a withdrawal which was accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff filed for a withdrawal which was accepted by the court.
The plaintiff filed for a withdrawal which was accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Withdrawal memo filed by plaintiff. Award seen passed by Lok adalath.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence case is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank Of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asha.P.G
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha.A.G
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R.Jagadish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.T.Saji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sabu.N.S(D1 and D2)
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement