Case Summary
CSB Bank Ltd. is the plaintiff represented by its Manager. The defendants include Sulatha S., Sajithan P., and Shini S. Kumar, who were set Exparte. The case was about the payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected as the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee even after repeated opportunities. The matter was heard and considered on the same day.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee despite several opportunities given by the court.
The plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee despite several opportunities given by the court.
Supporting Evidence
It is noted that even after providing repeated opportunities balance court fee not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- CSB Bank Ltd. ( Formerly Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulatha S.
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajithan P.
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shini S. Kumar
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Balance Court Fee remittance
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Niyas A. Salam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between CSB Bank Ltd. et al vs Sulatha S. et al regarding balance court fee
Case Code Year
Case between CSB Bank Ltd. et al vs Sulatha S. et al regarding balance court fee