Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 1757/2012

Case between M.Ananthakrishnan vs N.Annamma, A.Prasanna et al regarding tenancy dispute

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
Case Code No.
1757
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.Ananthakrishnan filed a suit against N.Annamma, A.Prasanna and others regarding a tenancy dispute. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed based on the memo filed by the plaintiff's counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed based on the memo filed by the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court based its decision on the plaintiff's counsel's memo stating that the suit was not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.Ananthakrishnan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.Annamma
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.Prasanna
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raghuvaran
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayasree Raghuvaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Monu
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Punchakari.M.Prabhakaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S.Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sivakumar.V.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.J.N.Jeeja Rani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreena.L.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Memo filed by counsel for plaintiff stating not pressed. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Anilkumar et al vs Vijayakumaran Nair et al regarding commission report
COURT OF ADDITIONAL I MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs Asha.P.G, Geetha.A.G regarding closure of suit
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devika.S.L. vs Nesan.P et al regarding rental control matter.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ninan Jacob vs Francis Edison regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pushpalatha.L vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won