Case Summary
The plaintiff, Remla Sahir, filed a suit against the defendant, Shaji.V, for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges harassment and threats from the defendant regarding her property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff, the plaintiff has established her case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant and his henchmen are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Remla Sahir
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shaji.V
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of lawyer notice dated 27.06.2023, Statement of account, Receipt issued from Attingal police station.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ashok P.Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Hari
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant and his henchmen are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this document as part of the evidence establishing the plaintiff's case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Account Statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was reviewed by the court to assess the financial transaction related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Police Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt was part of the documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographic evidence was presented to support the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Harassment
Case Code
Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour