Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 443/2023 — Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS 387/2025
Case between Muhammed Fari vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding temporary injunction
Muhammed Fari, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee and others regarding his removal as president of the Pallickal Mandalam committee of Indian National Congress. The case revolves around the legality of the petitioner's removal and the authority exercised by the respondents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1933/2023
Case between Socialist Republican Party et al vs The United Democratic Front et al regarding dismissal for default
The case involves the Socialist Republican Party represented by O.V. Sreedath as the plaintiff against the United Democratic Front and several other defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiffs were absent and did not take any steps after repeated directions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1340/2016
Case between Socialist Republican Party (SRP) et al vs S.Ranjith et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The Socialist Republican Party and other plaintiffs filed a suit against S.Ranjith and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not represented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.127/2022
Case between Faisy (Abdul Faisy) vs Jaseera regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Faisy and Shahudeen are plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction to protect their easement rights over a pathway. The defendant, Jaseera, is accused of attempting to obstruct access to this pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No. 315/2025
Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
The petitioner Sharafudheen is seeking a temporary injunction against his brother Nujumudheen to prevent him from encroaching on his property. The dispute arises over a pathway and allegations of unauthorized cutting of a new pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 343/ 2025
Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.
S. Jessi is the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Abdul Siyad and others from encroaching on her property. The case involves allegations of threats and attempts by the respondents to cut a new pathway through the petition schedule properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 288/2023
Case between Saju vs Varkala Municipality et al regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Saju is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Varkala Municipality and its officials, claiming they are attempting to illegally close down his hotel business. The case involves disputes over the operation of the hotel and alleged influence from the property's previous owner, Mr. Mohankumar.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 461/2023
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
Suresh Kumar filed a petition against Chicago Constructions International Private Limited and its Managing Director S. Mohanakumar, seeking a temporary injunction to prevent further construction on a property and to remove an unauthorized construction. The case revolves around issues of property possession and encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1133/2023
Case between K. Prathap kumar et al vs Sheela regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K. Prathap kumar and Jesmi, are seeking protection against the defendant, Sheela, who is attempting to encroach upon a public path used by the plaintiffs. The defendant has been set ex parte as she did not respond to the summons.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.549/2025
Case between C.S.Sudhan vs Abraham Paul et al regarding injunction.
C.S.Sudhan, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from forcibly evicting him from his property. The court has granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.839/2021
Case between M/S EDS Structures Private Limited vs M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
M/S EDS Structures Private Limited is the plaintiff against M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd and its Managing Director along with two other defendants regarding a dispute over a construction contract. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to make payments for services rendered as per an agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.273/2017
Case between K.P.Sanilkumar vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
K.P.Sanilkumar filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding unlawful trespass and demolition of his property. The plaintiff claims ownership and seeks an injunction against further trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.1274/2025
Case between Reghuthaman Nair vs Sindhu.K.V. et al regarding injunction
This case involves a petition for an injunction filed by Reghuthaman Nair against Sindhu.K.V. and Sreedhanya RS. The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's access to a building and constructing a boundary wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1144/2024
Case between Vinod T vs Biju B regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
Vinod T filed a suit against Biju B for permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is attempting to alienate property that he agreed to sell to the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1250/2023
Case between M.I. Shanavas Khan vs Ansar.H et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
M.I. Shanavas Khan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction against Ansar.H and others, who are accused of unlawfully attempting to take possession of the plaintiff's property to construct a Dargah. The defendants threatened the plaintiff and attempted to trespass into the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.972/2025
Case between Dr. Yamuna Prasad vs PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Dr. Yamuna Prasad and Dr. Asha Prasad, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, the PRS Krishna Apartment and its Secretary, Sajith S. Pillai. The case involves a dispute over the operation of a clinic by the plaintiffs and the defendants' attempts to remove signage related to the clinic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1422/2025
Case between E. Asha Thomas Vayalil Kollattu et al vs Emmanuel .K. Thachedathu regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, E. Asha Thomas and Manju Sajan George, are siblings who have filed a suit against their brother Emmanuel .K. Thachedathu regarding their mother's property rights. The case involves concerns over the defendant allegedly attempting to alienate property belonging to their elderly mother, who is suffering from Alzheimer's disease.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1568/2025
Case between M.V. Pradeep kumar et al vs T.R. Bhagyalekshmi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, M.V. Pradeep kumar and V.M. Bindu, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, T.R. Bhagyalekshmi and others, regarding a sewage pipeline issue. The plaintiffs claim illegal connection of sewage lines causing potential blockage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1189/2024
Case between Praseed.T et al vs I P C SALOM SENAYEE CHURCH HALL et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, consisting of Praseed T, his wife Sobhakumari, and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are associated with a church hall. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have been making loud noise from religious activities that disrupt their peaceful living.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 732/2025
Case between P.T. Thomas et al vs Satheesh Kumar regarding temporary injunction
P.T. Thomas and Lovely Mathew have filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against Satheesh Kumar to prevent the destruction of a lateral support property. The petitioners claim that the property has existed as lateral support for more than 200 years and is crucial for the protection of their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1875/2025
Case between Thusar P S vs M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited et al regarding property dispute
Thusar P S is the plaintiff seeking a remedy against M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited and several directors regarding a property dispute. The court is considering a petition for security against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1511/2019
Case between Shyam Manohari V.S vs Geetha O regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Shyam Manohari V.S, a widow and owner of a property, is involved in a legal dispute with her neighbor Geetha O, who is accused of making illegal constructions that violate building rules. Shyam seeks a permanent injunction against these constructions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1897/2025
Case between Dr.Cine Supriya V.R vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction against sewage line construction.
Dr.Cine Supriya V.R is the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants regarding the construction of a sewage line that allegedly encroaches on her property. The court considered the balance of convenience and irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 20 OF 2017
Case between Kunhava et al vs Shoukkathali et al regarding property damage
Petitioners filed a case seeking permission to sue as paupers due to damages caused by respondents to their property, including destruction of valuable items and a scooter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 400/2024
Case between M/s Nationalist Congress Party vs Mr. Roy Varicatt regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.
The case involves the Nationalist Congress Party represented by its State President, Mr. N. A Muhammed Kutty, against Mr. Roy Varicatt. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from misrepresenting himself as the State President of the party and using its symbols and flag, which has caused public confusion.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1066/2022
Case between N.A.Mohammedkutty vs Nationalist Congress Party et al regarding illegal expulsion from party
N.A.Mohammedkutty is the plaintiff who claims he was illegally expelled from the Nationalist Congress Party without following proper procedures. The defendants, including the party and its various officials, did not respond to the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.996/2020
Case between A.M. Shukur vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit.
A.M. Shukur filed a suit against multiple defendants including the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 917/2023
Case between Sudheesh Kumar S et al vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit
Sudheesh Kumar S filed a suit against the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee and others. The court has dismissed the case as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.154/2022
Case between Democratic Human Rights Movement Party et al vs Mani regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are the Democratic Human Rights Movement Party, represented by its President, and Rajan. The defendant is Mani. The case is about a suit that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS NO. 273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession
The plaintiffs, Margaret Solomon Cruz and others, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property that they claim to be rightfully theirs. The defendants, Mabel James and others, contest this claim, stating that the property has been rightfully assigned to them.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 137/2025
Case between Reenamony vs Remany, Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju regarding injunction
Reenamony is the petitioner seeking protection against the defendants Remany and Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju. The case involves a request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.136/2025
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 257/2020
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
A.K. Naseer is the plaintiff seeking declaration of title and a permanent injunction against Jamal Sha. The dispute arises over possession and ownership of certain properties in Edava village.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won