Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1144/2024

Case between Vinod T vs Biju B regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vinod T filed a suit against Biju B for permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is attempting to alienate property that he agreed to sell to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of Vinod T, granting him a permanent prohibitory injunction against Biju B.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of Vinod T, granting him a permanent prohibitory injunction against Biju B.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff and the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and the defendant is restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from alienating the property to any other person.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod T
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju B
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original sale Agreement dated 05.07.2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jose Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from alienating the property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as sought for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented as evidence of the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the sale of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinod T vs Biju B regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vinod T vs Biju B regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Reghuthaman Nair vs Sindhu.K.V. et al regarding injunction
THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.P.Sanilkumar vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S EDS Structures Private Limited vs M/s Excalibur Group Private Ltd regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between C.S.Sudhan vs Abraham Paul et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Prathap kumar et al vs Sheela regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won