Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 273/2022

Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri.ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Margaret Solomon Cruz and others, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property that they claim to be rightfully theirs. The defendants, Mabel James and others, contest this claim, stating that the property has been rightfully assigned to them.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the property in question until a full trial can be conducted to examine the claims of both parties.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the property in question until a full trial can be conducted to examine the claims of both parties.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is disposed as follows: 1. Both parties are directed to maintain status-quo as reported in Ext.C1-commission report and Ext.C1(a)-rough sketch. 2. There is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Margaret Solomon Cruz
Relation
W/o Late N.Solomon Cruz
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph Solomon Cruz
Relation
S/o Late N.Solomon Cruz
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joy Solomon
Relation
S/o Late N.Solomon Cruz
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nolin Selvin
Relation
D/o Late N.Solomon Cruz
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Eugene
Relation
D/o Late Solomon Cruz
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mabel James
Relation
D/o Clarancia Cruz
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cicil Gomez
Relation
S/o Clarancia Cruz
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Justine Solomon
Relation
S/o Late N. Solomon Cruz
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No. 5015/1958 of SRO, Varkala, Tax receipts
Defendants Documents
Tax receipts, Certified copy of Sthreedhana Kuri No. 1939 of SRO, Varkala

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S.Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Nima Vinod
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Roy.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners sought a temporary injunction to restrain respondents from trespassing.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is disposed as follows: Both parties are directed to maintain status-quo as reported in Ext.C1-commission report and Ext.C1(a)-rough sketch.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the sale deed through which the petitioners claim title over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the petitioners' claim of possession over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the petitioners' claim of possession over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This tax receipt shows continued payment for the property by the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This tax receipt further supports the petitioners' claim of ownership over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the changes made to the Thandaper account related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This survey plan outlines the subdivisions relevant to the petitioners' property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Survey Field Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides clarity on the property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This Thandaper account shows the property under the claim of the petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Basic Tax Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the petitioners' claim regarding tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Survey Proceeding Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This proceeding outlines the survey conducted concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate verifies the status of the petitioners' property.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Order Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This order pertains to the petitioners' complaint regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Field Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document pertains to another piece of property relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Form Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This form is related to the land issues discussed in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the respondents' claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt further corroborates the respondents' ownership claim.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the respondents' assertion of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt is evidence of tax payment by the respondents for the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the respondents' claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt evidences the tax payment by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt indicates the respondents' involvement with the property.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt further supports claims regarding property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt corroborates the respondents' ownership claim.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt signifies tax payment related to the respondents' property.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the respondents' claims regarding property.
Reference:
Ext.B11
Document Type: Sthreedhana Kuri Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is relevant to the respondents' claim of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B12
Document Type: Field Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This field document is relevant to the respondents' claims.
Reference:
Ext.B13
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This survey plan supports the respondents' territorial claims.
Reference:
Ext.B14
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This certificate supports the respondents' ownership status.
Reference:
Ext.B15
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt evidences further tax payment by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.B16
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This tax receipt supports the respondents' ownership claims.
Reference:
Ext.B17
Document Type: Police Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt relates to a police entry relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B18
Document Type: Police Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This police receipt is associated with a complaint relevant to the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B19
Document Type: Pendrive
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This item is noted but its relevance is unclear in the context of the case.
Reference:
Ext.B20
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report provides findings and recommendations from the commissioner on property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This rough sketch accompanies the commission report and visualizes property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession
Case Code Year
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya et al vs Kamalakshy et al regarding declaration of settlement deeds null and void and partition of properties
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won