Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 257/2020

Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-4 years 29 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A.K. Naseer is the plaintiff seeking declaration of title and a permanent injunction against Jamal Sha. The dispute arises over possession and ownership of certain properties in Edava village.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared A.K. Naseer as the absolute owner of the property and restrained Jamal Sha from trespassing and committing any waste on the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared A.K. Naseer as the absolute owner of the property and restrained Jamal Sha from trespassing and committing any waste on the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved ownership and possession of the property through relevant documents and evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved ownership and possession of the property through relevant documents and evidence.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- 1. It's hereby declared that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of plaint schedule property. 2. The defendant is restrained by way of a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.K. Naseer
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jamal Sha
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Partition deed No. 3700/2015 of Varkala SRO, Tax receipts.
Defendants Documents
Certified Copy of Judgment in O.S. 151/2010 of Hon’ble Sub Court, Attingal, Certified copy of Partition deed No. 3282/1992 of Varkala S.R.O.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.R. Bilahari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Shefin N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.G. Harikrishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Saabir F. Haq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of title in favor of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
It's hereby declared that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibition against the defendant from trespassing onto or committing waste on the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is restrained by way of a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Costs of the suit.
Evidence:
No order as to costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the plaintiff's claim to ownership and title over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence that the plaintiff has been paying tax for the property, indicating ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate confirms the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document also serves as evidence of the plaintiff's payment of property tax.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This report includes findings relevant to the disputed property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This sketch provides a visual representation related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is referenced by the defendant to claim ownership and relates to the partition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.B11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Thu, 09/03/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya et al vs Kamalakshy et al regarding declaration of settlement deeds null and void and partition of properties
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown