Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 257/ 2020

Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A.K. Naseer is the plaintiff claiming ownership of property in Edava village. The defendant, Jamal Sha, has allegedly attempted to trespass on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared A.K. Naseer as the absolute owner of the property and issued a permanent injunction against Jamal Sha from trespassing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared A.K. Naseer as the absolute owner of the property and issued a permanent injunction against Jamal Sha from trespassing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of ownership and possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of ownership and possession of the property.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has been possessing and enjoying the plaint schedule property as its absolute owner and has produced tax receipts and other documents confirming ownership.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. It's hereby declared that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of plaint schedule property. 2. The defendant is restrained by way of a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.K. Naseer
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jamal Sha
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Partition deed No. 3700/2015, Tax Receipt No. 0488621, Possession Certificate No. 1877/2023, Tax Receipt No. KL01060407186/2023.
Defendants Documents
Certified Copy of Judgment in O.S. 151/2010, Certified Copy of Gift deed No. 3282/1992.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.R. Bilahari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Shefin N.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.G. Harikrishna
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Saabir F. Haq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of title over the plaint schedule property in favor of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
It's hereby declared that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is restrained by way of a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates that the plaintiff has been remitting tax for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the possession of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates continued remittance of tax by the plaintiff for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Court ordered report and sketch relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Visual documentation prepared by the Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Contests the plaintiff's claim to the ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.B11
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows tax payment relevant to the property by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B40
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows tax payment relevant to the property by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B41
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows tax payment relevant to the property by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B42

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Sun, 03/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sahir M.H. vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jacob vs Jetroode regarding declaration of title by adverse possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya et al vs Kamalakshy et al regarding declaration of settlement deeds null and void and partition of properties
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between A.K. Naseer vs Jamal Sha regarding declaration of title and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and possession
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown