Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No. 343/ 2025

Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S. Jessi is the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Abdul Siyad and others from encroaching on her property. The case involves allegations of threats and attempts by the respondents to cut a new pathway through the petition schedule properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner, restraining the first respondent from encroaching into the petition schedule properties until the suit is disposed of.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction granted in favor of the petitioner restraining the first respondent from encroaching into the petition schedule properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner, restraining the first respondent from encroaching into the petition schedule properties until the suit is disposed of.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner is in absolute possession and ownership of the petition A and B schedule properties, and there is no right for the respondents to encroach.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner is in absolute possession and ownership of the petition A and B schedule properties, and there is no right for the respondents to encroach.
Supporting Evidence
It is clear that the petitioner is in absolute possession and ownership of the petition A and B schedule properties. There is no pathway available through the property of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: 1. A temporary injunction is granted in favour of the petitioner and first respondent is restrained from encroaching into the petition schedule properties and cutting open a new pathway through any part of the petition A and B schedule properties till the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Jessi
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Siyad
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of settlement Deed No. 1227/ 2010, Certified copy of settlement deed No 447/ 2024, Tax Receipt dated 15/04/2025, Tax Receipt dated 24/09/2025.
Defendants Documents
Basic Tax Register of Ayiroor Village office, Complaint submitted by Abdul Siyad, Report No. 565/ 2025 of Ayiroor Village Office dated 15/09/2025, Copy of U O Note, dated 22/09/2025, Copy of Letter No. 4225643- 2025 dated 16/10/2025.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Devadas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Joy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the respondents from encroaching into the petition A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
The petition is allowef as follows: 1.A temporary injunction is granted in favour of the petitioner and first respondent is restrained from encroaching into the petition schedule properties and cutting open a new pathway through any part of the petition A and B schedule properties till the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed confirming ownership of the petition A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed confirming ownership of the petition B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt evidencing payment of tax related to the petition A and B schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt evidencing payment of tax related to the petition A and B schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax Register
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Basic tax register document related to the respondent's property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Complaint submitted by the defendant regarding encroachment issues.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Report from the village office on the encroachment complaint.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: U O Note
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Internal note regarding encroachment issues.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Letter from the Grama Panchayat regarding property measurements.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report submitted by the appointed commissioner regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough plan submitted by the appointed commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.
Case Code Year
Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Saju vs Varkala Municipality et al regarding granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Faisy (Abdul Faisy) vs Jaseera regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won