Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1897/2025

Case between Dr.Cine Supriya V.R vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction against sewage line construction.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration
Case Code No.
1897
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr.Cine Supriya V.R is the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants regarding the construction of a sewage line that allegedly encroaches on her property. The court considered the balance of convenience and irreparable injury to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and granted a temporary injunction against the construction of the sewage line that could drain water into the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction against the second defendant from constructing the sewage line that drains into the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and granted a temporary injunction against the construction of the sewage line that could drain water into the plaintiff's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that there was a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was in favor of the petitioner, demonstrating potential irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that there was a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was in favor of the petitioner, demonstrating potential irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that no relief can be granted against the 3rd defendant and they are not undertaking the work of sewage line. Thus, there is prima facie case and balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioner. Further irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner, if the injunction is not allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

The defendant No. 2 is restrained from constructing sewage line so as to cause drainage water draining into the plaint schedule property by encroaching into the ground portion of eastern side wall of plaint schedule or any side of plaint schedule property, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr.Cine Supriya V.R
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala represented by District Collector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Assistant Executive Engineer PWD (Road Division)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation represented by Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Will Deed No.45/2001, Tax Receipt, Survey Plan
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ziayad.M.Kollam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Pratheeshmohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the second defendant from constructing the sewage line that drains into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant No. 2 is restrained from constructing sewage line so as to cause drainage water draining into the plaint schedule property by encroaching into the ground portion of eastern side wall of plaint schedule or any side of plaint schedule property, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to establish ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to provide evidence related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to show the layout of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Marked to assess the construction and potential drainage issues.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Marked to illustrate the physical aspects of the property relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between K.P.Sanilkumar vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajithkhan et al vs Directorate of Factories & Boilers et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won