Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.546/2017

Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-06
Duration
Case Code No.
546
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S.R. Amritha filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case, leading to default dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case, leading to default dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.R. Amritha
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vilapil Grama Panchayath
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri Vidhu Mohan K.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.N. Satheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Rex. D.G
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Anusha vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thara Kumari.S et al vs Premalatha.S.Nair et al regarding compromise agreement
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won