Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1258/2019

Case between Thara Kumari.S et al vs Premalatha.S.Nair et al regarding compromise agreement

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Code No.
1258
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by Thara Kumari.S, Mangaleswari, and Pichumani, filed a suit against the defendants, led by Premalatha.S.Nair, regarding a compromise agreement. The court found the terms of the agreement to be lawful and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement. The agreement is included as part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement. The agreement is included as part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of terms of compromise agreement, it is revealed that the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thara Kumari.S
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mangaleswari
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pichumani
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premalatha.S.Nair
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dalu Vinod
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Government of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinod Rajkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Venu Valiyaparambil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Divya.P.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Kulathoor Rahul.L.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vellarada Rethin.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
IA 9/25 is allowed. Hence suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Anusha vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won