Case Summary
Thusar P S is the plaintiff seeking a remedy against M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited and several directors regarding a property dispute. The court is considering a petition for security against the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of the property and requirement to furnish security.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has directed the defendants to either furnish security or show cause regarding the property in question. A conditional attachment has been placed on the property pending the outcome.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff made a prima facie case demonstrating intent by the defendants to obstruct execution of a decree.
The plaintiff made a prima facie case demonstrating intent by the defendants to obstruct execution of a decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff made a prima facie case demonstrating intent by the defendants to obstruct execution of a decree.
The plaintiff made a prima facie case demonstrating intent by the defendants to obstruct execution of a decree.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and I am satisfied that the counter petitioner/defendant with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against them is about to dispose of the whole or any part of the petition schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
The counter petitioners/defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.8,05,000/- or to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thusar P S
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Easwardas Lazer
- Relation
- Managing Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remani Chinnu
- Relation
- Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lija Ramani
- Relation
- Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suja Eswardas
- Relation
- Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sunil N Shenoi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Swapna Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The counter petitioners/defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.8,05,000/- or to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.
Evidence:
the counter petitioners/defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.8,05,000/- or to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The 0.815 ares of the petition schedule property is conditionally attached.
Evidence:
In the meantime the 0.815 ares of the petition schedule property is conditionally attached.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thusar P S vs M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited et al regarding property dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Thusar P S vs M/s. Lars Green Automobiles Private Limited et al regarding property dispute