Case Summary
The plaintiffs are the Democratic Human Rights Movement Party, represented by its President, and Rajan. The defendant is Mani. The case is about a suit that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to adduce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Democratic Human Rights Movement Party
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mani
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri .Madavoor G. Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Praveen. S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Democratic Human Rights Movement Party et al vs Mani regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Democratic Human Rights Movement Party et al vs Mani regarding dismissal for default