Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 344/2024

Case between Surumi. H vs Sameena et al regarding Interim Attachment Order

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
Case Code No.
344
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Surumi. H filed a petition against Sameena and others for an interim attachment order. The court allowed the petition based on the materials presented.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for interim attachment based on the review of the materials presented by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim attachment order made absolute
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for interim attachment based on the review of the materials presented by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the materials presented by the plaintiff sufficient to allow the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the materials presented by the plaintiff sufficient to allow the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that this Petition can be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

After considering the materials this court is of the view that this Petition can be allowed. Hence interim attachment order is made absolute.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Surumi. H
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sameena
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahabana
Party Age
15
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shifana
Party Age
13
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shifna
Party Age
9
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheik Akram
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Krishna Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim attachment order is made absolute.
Evidence:
After considering the materials this court is of the view that this Petition can be allowed. Hence interim attachment order is made absolute.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lilly et al regarding interim attachment
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Fari vs Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Syamji vs Preetha et al regarding temporary injunction to prevent construction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.Ananthakrishnan vs N.Annamma, A.Prasanna et al regarding tenancy dispute
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pushpalatha.L vs Suresh et al regarding dismissal of suit
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won