Similar Cases
Based on: RP.No.899/2023 — Case between Shambu vs Sebastian regarding restoration of applications I.A. No. 7641/2016 and I.A. No. 7642/2016
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
RP.No. 896/2024
Case between Mohanan vs Thomas Mathew et al regarding a petition dismissed for default.
The case involves a petition filed by Mohanan, who was absent during the hearing. The defendants, represented by their advocates, were present and objected to the petition. As the petitioner was not represented, the petition was dismissed for default.
unknown
Defendant Won
RP.No.874/2023
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lekha A et al regarding petition dismissal
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition which was heard by the court. The petitioner was absent, and the petition was dismissed for default.
Unknown
Defendant Won
RP.No.1013/2024
Case between Soumya.C.S vs S.Prasanna Babu regarding rent control matters.
Soumya.C.S filed a petition in the Rent Control Court against S.Prasanna Babu. The court heard the case and issued an order regarding costs to be paid.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.20/2024
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
Vinod Kumar, represented by his wife Archana Devi S.G, filed a review petition against Sainudeen. The court heard the matter and noted that both parties settled the issue, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Review Petition
Defendant Won
RP.No.1020/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kunjumon.T regarding restoration of petitions
The case involves a petition by Kerala Gramin Bank seeking to restore a petition that was dismissed due to non-representation. The court dismissed the petition on the grounds that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient details.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
RP.No.998/2023
Case between G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair vs Jose.F regarding review of a rejected plaint
G.S. Chandrasekharan Nair is the plaintiff seeking to review a court order that rejected his plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees. Jose.F is the defendant opposing the petition for review.
Review Petition
Defendant Won
RP.No.3/2025
Case between Roy Emerson Ivan, Margaret Roy vs Suma S regarding Rent Control Petition
The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, Roy Emerson Ivan and Margaret Roy, who have filed a Rent Control Petition for eviction against the defendant Suma S. The original petitioners argue that the defendant failed to comply with a previous court order regarding payment of rent.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.308/2025
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lekha A, Jayachandran V regarding restoration of petition
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition seeking restoration of a previous petition that was dismissed for default. The defendants, Lekha A and Jayachandran V, did not object to the petition.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.1367/2023
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Rajan Varghese et al regarding review of plaint rejection
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited filed a review petition against the rejection of their plaint for recovery of an amount due. The defendants, Rajan Varghese and Alan Monsy, did not appear for the proceedings.
Review Petition
Defendant Won
RP.No.352/2023
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Dhanya.U.M Kumar et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff seeking to restore a dismissed application related to a money recovery suit. The defendants have objected to the application, citing negligence in taking steps for representation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.593/2025
Case between Sindhu.K vs Bindu Shijit et al regarding review of order
The case involves a review petition filed by the defendants challenging a previous order. The court had passed an order that the plaintiff was to take further steps regarding the commission report, which the defendants claim is irregular.
Review Petition
Defendant Won
RP.No.586/2025
Case between Roy Emerson Ivan et al vs Suma S regarding review of Rent Control Petition
This case involves a review petition filed by Suma S against the order in a Rent Control Petition for eviction from a scheduled building. The original petitioner, Roy Emerson Ivan, and his wife contest the review on the grounds of maintainability and lack of proper procedure.
Rent Control Proceeding
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn. 2012/2018
Case between Jafer Kalluvalappil vs Shabeeb. V.P regarding Allowance of Petition
Jafer Kalluvalappil filed a petition against Shabeeb. V.P. The court decided to allow the petition after consideration of the presented arguments.
Restorative Petition
Plaintiff Won
RCP.No.52/2022
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
R.Vijayakumar filed a petition against Arun Mohan regarding non-compliance with a previous court order related to a rental property. The court ordered Arun Mohan to put R.Vijayakumar in possession of the building.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
R.C.P.No.60/2024
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
Ashraf Ali filed a rent control petition against Badhusha. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Rent Control Petition
Defendant Won
O.P (Pauper) 01/2022
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
The case involves Sreedevi as the plaintiff seeking money from Mahesh, the defendant. The application was filed for the realization of money, and Sreedevi claimed to be unable to pay court fees.
Application in Pauper Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.183/2025
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
Anitha Kumari.L.K and her children are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Madhu.S and Gangadevi. The case involves restraining the defendants from making constructions in certain properties until a specified date.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.194/2025
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran and Divakaran Padma Kumar Pillay, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Deepti Sivan, to restrain her from transferring certain stocks and shares. The court found that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case warranting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.48/2022
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
Sreenath.S is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thankarajan and Usha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not press memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.204/2023
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
The plaintiffs Sindhu.S, Janaki.B.S, and Mohandas.D are involved in a suit against defendants Lalitha and Ashok Kumar.I. The case was dismissed as withdrawn after being heard.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.315/2023
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak filed a suit against Babu Chettiyar and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from demolishing her compound wall and causing waste on her property. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction from the defendants, which poses a risk to her safety and property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.375/2023
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves the Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Midhun. M as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.394/2019
Case between All India Sports Council for Deaf vs The Deaf Cricket Society et al regarding return of suit
The case involves the All India Sports Council for Deaf as the plaintiff against The Deaf Cricket Society and others as defendants. The court addressed procedural issues regarding the proper jurisdiction for the lawsuit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.423/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding civil proceedings
The plaintiffs, including the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and its representatives, are involved in a civil case against the Indian Pentecostal Church of God and its councils. The suit addresses matters related to church governance and representation.
Civil Suit
OS.No.470/2021
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Basheer K.H et al regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants Basheer K.H, Smt. Sameera Basheer, and Babeer T.P for recovery of a loan amount. The case was heard ex-parte as the defendants did not appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.598/2024
Case between Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor et al vs Indian Pentecostal Church of God et al regarding Power of Attorney
The case involves the Indian Pentecostal Church of God Tabor and various defendants from the Indian Pentecostal Church of God regarding the acceptance of a power of attorney. The plaintiffs challenge the validity of the power of attorney executed by the third defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.718/2020
Case between Beatrice Miranda vs Sheela Tommy et al regarding violation of injunction order
Beatrice Miranda filed a petition alleging that the respondents violated an injunction order preventing them from trespassing on her property. The court addressed the claims related to the pathway and constructed gate leading to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.777/2016
Case between I. Thankanilavu vs S. Kumar regarding Suit for realistion of money.
The plaintiff, I. Thankanilavu, is seeking recovery of ₹5,00,000/- from the defendant, S. Kumar, who did not hand over the shop room as agreed upon. The plaintiff claims the defendant breached their agreement and has not returned the money.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.860 /2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
The case involves Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, against Smt. Sheeja. N regarding the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees. The court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1043/2017
Case between Antony vs Stansilas et al regarding partition and injunction
The case involves a dispute over a property originally owned by the father of the plaintiff Antony and the defendants. The plaintiff seeks partition and injunction against the defendants attempting to evict him from the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1065/2017
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
The plaintiffs, M.V. Shafi and M.V. Shanavas, contend they are entitled to a share of their father's property, claiming that the partitions made by their father, M M. Vahabudeen, are null and void. The defendants argue against this claim and state the suit is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1190/2018
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Santhosh Kumar, for the recovery of a loan of ₹1,55,178/- due to non-repayment. The defendant had taken a loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to comply with the repayment terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1430/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
The case involves Indian Overseas Bank as the plaintiff and Aradhi Restaurant as the defendant, represented by its Proprietress. The court dealt with the rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fees and lack of applications.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1475/2022
Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Bindu, is the owner of a building from which she has attempted to evict a tenant due to non-payment of rent. The defendant, Jayakumar, allegedly attempted to trespass into the property, prompting the lawsuit for an injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1940/2013
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.
The case involves the plaintiffs seeking a mandatory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants regarding certain shop rooms and a residential building. The additional second plaintiff, who is the son of the first plaintiff, claims the defendants have been occupying the premises without proper rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2023
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. initiated a suit against Justin.V.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff despite notice.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1664/2024
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
Mithun John Mathew is the plaintiff against Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala. The suit was finally heard on January 31, 2025, and the court delivered its judgment on the same day.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP. No. 276/2024
Case between Vivek.S vs Meenambika regarding delivery of vacant possession.
Vivek.S, the decree holder, is involved in a case against Meenambika, the judgment debtor, regarding the delivery of vacant possession of a building. The court appointed an Amin to facilitate the delivery.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.182/2025
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M., is seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Rajan, to prevent interference with the plaint scheduled property. The court was satisfied that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.184/2025
Case between Asok Kumar et al vs Vinaya Chandran et al regarding injunction
The petitioners, Asok Kumar and Shaji, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, Vinaya Chandran, Vinisha Chandran, and Sreejith, to prevent further construction on certain properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.366/2020
Case between Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu vs Sudha regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, Thribhuvana Vikraman @ Thribhu, was absent during the hearing, and there was no representation. As a result, the case was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.704/2017
Case between W. Selvaraj vs Sam Raj et al regarding rejection of plaint
W. Selvaraj is the plaintiff who brought the case against Sam Raj and Kala Suresh regarding a civil matter. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1000/2021
Case between Rajagopal vs Mani Mekhala regarding IA.No.5/2021
This case involves Rajagopal as the defendant and Mani Mekhala as the plaintiff. The court is addressing an interim application regarding certain disputes between the parties.
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1379/2014
Case between Ouseph @ Santhosh et al vs Stella Victo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves a dispute over a pathway claimed by the plaintiff, Ouseph @ Santhosh, against the defendant, Stella Victo. The plaintiff alleges obstruction by the defendant, which has led to this suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Counter Claim
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1888/2022
Case between Harikumar.S.P vs Lalitha.O et al regarding plaint rejection
Harikumar.S.P is the plaintiff, while Lalitha.O and Manu.M.L are the defendants. The case involves the rejection of the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1978/2022
Case between Aji vs Rajasekharan Nair regarding injunction and other consequential reliefs.
Aji filed a suit against Rajasekharan Nair seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property sale agreement. The defendant failed to execute the sale deed as agreed, leading to the plaintiff's legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1285 /2024
Case between Smitha S.K vs B. Syamalakumari et al regarding dismissal of suit
Smitha S.K filed a suit against B. Syamalakumari and Soumya. S. K. The case was heard and the plaintiff's counsel stated that the suit is not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won