Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.3/2025

Case between Roy Emerson Ivan, Margaret Roy vs Suma S regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
Court of Rent Control
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-11-03
Duration
approximately-8 months
Case Code No.
3
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, Roy Emerson Ivan and Margaret Roy, who have filed a Rent Control Petition for eviction against the defendant Suma S. The original petitioners argue that the defendant failed to comply with a previous court order regarding payment of rent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for review and the petitioner is directed to pay costs to the original petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of Rs.500/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents/original petitioners.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for review and the petitioner is directed to pay costs to the original petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed primarily because the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed primarily because the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest the case.
Supporting Evidence
It is seen that without considering the objection to main Rent Control Petition or objection to IA.1/2025, the petition was seen allowed. Moreover, the learned counsel for petitioner has already seen relinquished the Vakkalath but no notice was issued to the party.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed on costs of Rs.500/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents/original petitioners within seven days from the date of the order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roy Emerson Ivan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Margaret Roy
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suma S
Relation
C/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Bhagavath Singh C.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Arya.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.S.Sabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed on costs of Rs.500/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents/original petitioners.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed on costs of Rs.500/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents/original petitioners within seven days from the date of the order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Soumya.C.S vs S.Prasanna Babu regarding rent control matters.
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Anzar Jamaludeen vs Sukumari.M.L et al regarding production of thumb impression register
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Barbara Thomas vs Sonia Benny regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won