Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.1013/2024

Case between Soumya.C.S vs S.Prasanna Babu regarding rent control matters.

Court
Court of Rent Control
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-10
Duration
Case Code No.
1013
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Soumya.C.S filed a petition in the Rent Control Court against S.Prasanna Babu. The court heard the case and issued an order regarding costs to be paid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and ordered costs to be paid by the petitioner to the counter petitioner and to the District Legal Service Authority.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of Rs.1500/- to be paid by petitioner to counter petitioner, Rs.500/- to be paid by petitioner to District Legal Service Authority.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and ordered costs to be paid by the petitioner to the counter petitioner and to the District Legal Service Authority.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed based on the merits presented during the hearing.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed based on the merits presented during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
The petition was allowed based on the merits presented during the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

Heard Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.1500/- to be paid by petitioner to counter petitioner, Rs.500/- to be paid by petitioner to District Legal Service Authority, Thiruvananthapuram.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soumya.C.S
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.Prasanna Babu
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Anil Kumar.A.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of Rs.1500/- to be paid by petitioner to counter petitioner and Rs.500/- to be paid by petitioner to District Legal Service Authority
Evidence:
the court on same day passed the following. Petition is allowed on costs of Rs.1500/- to be paid by petitioner to counter petitioner, Rs.500/- to be paid by petitioner to District Legal Service Authority, Thiruvananthapuram.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Roy Emerson Ivan, Margaret Roy vs Suma S regarding Rent Control Petition
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Anzar Jamaludeen vs Sukumari.M.L et al regarding production of thumb impression register
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Barbara Thomas vs Sonia Benny regarding Rent Control Petition
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won